'a cold raw frost fog, dark and dreary. preached in the morning an old sermon on gathering up the fragments from john vi, 12...' - kilvert's diary, 21st january 1872.
'gather up the fragments that remain, that nothing be lost.' - john vi. 12.
this is (in fact) from the parable of the loaves and the fishes, a tale of magical increase. we are just being reminded that it is not usually this way.
today the anniversary of the thule airforce base B-52 crash in 1968. this lead to the detonation of the conventional explosive components of at least three of the the four B28 nuclear bombs being carried scattering radioactive material over a wide area.
this subsequently led to the thulegate affair and cleanup workers' compensation claims.
military nuclear accidents were much more common than horsemouth thought when he was interested in this field. he had only heard of this and the 1966 palomares crash (17th january 1966).
today a wander both to the crossroads and up the hill to deliver eggs. he managed to get all of this in before the rain (and it is due to rain a lot over the next few days).
so here's horsemouth and the madness is continuing.
so (let horsemouth get this straight) a US president is heavying the european members of NATO into giving/ selling to him a giant resource rich island. (it is a brilliant distraction from whatever else might be happening). with friends like these who needs enemies (both sides remark).
now the kingdom of denmark's claim to greenland is about as spurious as the united states of america's claim to its slice of the north american continent (it's right of conquest all the way down). the european NATO 'allies' lack the military power to tell the US to 'jog on', they might be able to delay it all until trump's power starts to wane (after the mid-terms), they might be able to craft a path to selling him greenland that looks like compliance but is in fact mere appeasement.
the US is an unreliable ally it has to go. the european powers may believe that trump is a temporary aberration but he may not be.
as a kid (and yes he really was that kind of a brat) horsemouth read a book about sir william stephenson (a man called intrepid). in it stephenson is responsible for dragging the US into the second world war on the british side - a thing that seems obvious enough to us from our vantage point but may have been a mere historical contingency. this book has been heavily criticised for distorting stephenson's significance but it at least opens up that isolationist US politics before the familiar dispensation was in place.
here a rainy day. horsemouth's mum is off into the village.






